Examining racial/ethnic inequities in treatment participation among perinatal individuals with depression.

OBJECTIVE: A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of two interventions for addressing perinatal depression treatment in obstetric settings was conducted. This secondary analysis compared treatment referral and participation among Minoritized perinatal individuals compared to their non-Hispanic white counterparts. METHODS: Among perinatal individuals with depression symptoms, we examined rates of treatment 1) referral (i.e., offered medications or referred to mental health clinician), 2) initiation (i.e., attended ≥1 mental health visit or reported prescribed antidepressant medication), and 3) sustainment (i.e., attended >1 mental health visit per study month or prescribed antidepressant medication at time of study interviews). We compared non-Hispanic white (NHW) (n = 149) vs. Minoritized perinatal individuals (Black, Asian, Hispanic/Latina, Pacific Islander, Native American, Multiracial, and white Hispanic/Latina n = 157). We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for each outcome. RESULTS: Minoritized perinatal individuals across both interventions had significantly lower odds of treatment referral (aOR = 0.48;95% CI = 0.27-0.88) than their NHW counterparts. There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of treatment initiation (aOR = 0.64 95% CI:0.36-1.2) or sustainment (aOR = 0.54;95% CI = 0.28-1.1) by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal mental healthcare inequities are associated with disparities in treatment referrals. Interventions focusing on referral disparities across race and ethnicity are needed.

Association of random and observed urine drug screening with long-term retention in opioid treatment programs.

BACKGROUND: In the US, opioid treatment providers (OTPs) have wide latitude to perform urine drug screening (UDS) and discharge clients for positive results. OTP clients have identified randomized and directly observed UDS as potentially stigmatizing, but little research has examined the association between UDS modality and retention in OTPs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study uses the 2016-2017 NDATSS wave among OTPs that administered methadone. The exposure was a 4-level variable based on whether OTPs had a high percentage (≥ 90% of clients) who experienced randomized, observed, both, or neither modality of UDS. The outcome was the proportion of clients retained in treatment 1 year or longer (long-term retention). Analyses were conducted using fractional logit regression with survey weighting and presented as percentages and 95% confidence intervals. We also present how policies for involuntary clinic discharge modify these effects. RESULTS: 150 OTPs were eligible with a median of 310 clients. 40 (27%) OTPs did not highly utilize either randomized or observed UDS, 22 (15%) only highly utilized observed UDS, 42 (28%) only highly utilized randomized UDS and 46 (31%) utilized both practices on ≥ 90% of clients. Adjusted estimates for long-term retention ranged from 57.7% in OTPs that conducted both randomized and observed UDS on ≥ 90% of clients and 70.4% in OTPs that did not highly utilize these practices. Involuntary discharge may moderate this relationship. CONCLUSION: Findings showed an association between high utilization of randomized and observed UDS and decreased long-term retention, suggesting that UDS modality may impact long-term OTP retention.

Understanding Perinatal Depression Care Gaps by Examining Care Access and Barriers in Perinatal Individuals With and Without Psychiatric History.

Background: Depression affects one in seven perinatal individuals and remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Individuals with a psychiatric history are at an even greater risk of perinatal depression, but it is unclear how their experiences with the depression care pathway may differ from individuals without a psychiatric history. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis evaluating care access and barriers to care in perinatal individuals who screened positive for depression using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (N = 280). Data were analyzed from the PRogram in Support of Moms (PRISM) study, a cluster randomized controlled trial of two interventions for perinatal depression. Results: Individuals with no prepregnancy psychiatric history (N = 113), compared with those with a history (N = 167), were less likely to be screened for perinatal depression, and less likely to be offered a therapy referral, although equally likely to attend if referred. When examining how these differences affected outcomes, those without a psychiatric history had 46% lower odds of attending therapy (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-1.55), 79% lower odds of taking medication (95% CI: 0.08-0.54), and 80% lower odds of receiving any depression care (95% CI: 0.08-0.47). Barriers were similar across groups, except for concerns regarding available treatments and beliefs about self-resolution of symptoms, which were more prevalent in individuals without a psychiatric history. Conclusions: Perinatal individuals without a prepregnancy psychiatric history were less likely to be screened, referred, and treated for depression. Differences in screening and referrals resulted in missed opportunities for care, reinforcing the urgent need for universal mental health screening and psychoeducation during the perinatal period. Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT02935504.

The role of perinatal psychiatry access programs in advancing mental health equity.

This editorial presents: 1) a review of Perinatal Psychiatry Access Programs as an integrated care model with potential for promoting perinatal mental health equity; and 2) a summary of how the model has been and can be further adapted to help achieve perinatal mental health equity in geographically diverse settings. Within the editorial, we highlight Access Programs as a promising model for promoting perinatal mental health equity. This editorial is supported by original descriptive data on the Lifeline for Moms National Network of Perinatal Psychiatric Access Programs. Descriptive data is additionally provided on three statewide Access Programs. The Access Program model, and the accompanying Network of Access Programs, is a multi-level approach demonstrating promise in reducing perinatal mental health inequities. Access Programs demonstrate potential to implement interventions to address well-documented inequities in perinatal mental healthcare access at the patient-, clinician-, practice-, community-, and policy-levels. For Access Programs to leverage their potential to advance perinatal mental health equity, systematic efforts are needed that include partnership with impacted communities and implementation teams.

Complicating Narratives of Sexual Minority Mental Health: An Intersectional Analysis of Frequent Mental Distress at the Intersection of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Race/Ethnicity.

Purpose: Research indicates that sexual minority populations experience mental health inequities. However, few studies have examined mental health outcomes in sexual minority populations while including intersecting dimensions of social identity. This study had two objectives: (1) to quantify the prevalence of frequent mental distress among U.S. adults across intersecting social identity categories and (2) to evaluate the contribution of intersectional interactions to observed inequities. Methods: Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2014-2019 (N = 1,024,261), we performed an intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (I-MAIHDA). Participants were nested in 45 intersectional groups defined by combining 3 sexual orientation (gay/lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual), 5 gender identity (transgender women, transgender men, gender nonconforming, cisgender women, and cisgender men), and 3 racial/ethnic (non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and non-Hispanic White) categories. We estimated the predicted probability of frequent mental distress for each stratum. We then calculated the variance partition coefficient (VPC) and proportional change in variance (PCV). Results: We found that multiply marginalized groups tended to have the highest prevalence of frequent mental distress. Groups with racial/ethnic minority individuals were equally represented among low- and high-prevalence groups. The VPC indicated that slightly over 10% of observed variance in prevalence was attributable to group-level differences, while the PCV revealed that a small but meaningful amount of observed heterogeneity in prevalence was due to intersectional interactions between the dimensions of social identity. Conclusion: I-MAIHDA is a promising method for examining the patterning of sexual orientation-based mental health inequities at the population level.

Investigating a key structural determinant of health, racism, and related social determinants of health in Massachusetts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A disproportionate burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is being shouldered by members of racial and ethnic minorities and socially disadvantaged communities. Structural and social determinants of health have been recognized as key contributors to the inequalities observed. Racism, a major structural determinant of health that patterns related social determinants of health, in the USA, warrants further investigation. In this perspective piece we provide an overview of the historical context of racism, followed by preliminary findings from the ongoing COVIDStory study-a cross-sectional study addressing perceptions of COVID-19 and COVID-19 research-that highlights the experiences of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic identifying adult participants, residing in Worcester Massachusetts, during the COVID-19 pandemic. We then discuss these findings in the context of current and past research considering racism and relevant social determinants of health. Our study results suggest that racism and its residuals (residential segregation, economic insecurity, discrimination, bias, and vigilance) are modern challenges for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic participants, and these findings are supported by the existing literature. It is our hope that this perspective piece provides additional evidence for action on structural and social determinants affecting the health of minoritized people, especially those living in Massachusetts.

Perspectives on barriers and facilitators to mental health support after a traumatic birth among a sample of primarily White and privately insured patients.

OBJECTIVE: To elicit the perspectives of individuals with a traumatic birth experience on barriers and facilitators to receiving mental health support in the postpartum period. METHODS: Individuals who experienced a traumatic birth within the last three years (n = 32) completed semi-structured phone interviews about their birth and postpartum experience. The Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-V (PCL-5), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) were administered. Qualitative data was analyzed using a modified grounded theory by three independent coders. RESULTS: Among participants, 34.4% screened positive for PTSD, 18.8% for depression, and 34.4% for anxiety. Participants described multi-level barriers that prevented clinicians from recognizing and supporting patients' postpartum mental health needs; those involved lack of communication, education, and resources. Recommendations from participants included that 1) obstetric professionals should acknowledge birth-related trauma experienced by any individual, 2) providers of multiple disciplines need to be integrated into postpartum care, and 3) mental health support may be needed before the ambulatory postpartum visit. CONCLUSIONS: There are multi-level barriers towards detecting and responding to individuals' mental health needs after a traumatic birth. Obstetric professionals need to use a trauma-informed approach and proactively assess mental health throughout the postpartum period.

Aging and COVID-19 in Minority Populations: a Perfect Storm.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: COVID-19 is a major concern for the health and wellbeing of individuals worldwide. As COVID-19 cases and deaths continue to increase in the USA, aging Black and Hispanic populations have emerged as especially at-risk for increased exposure to COVID-19 and susceptibility to severe health outcomes. The current review discusses the weathering hypothesis and the influence of social inequality on the identified health disparities. RECENT FINDINGS: Aging minoritized populations have endured structural and social inequality over the lifecourse. Consequently, these populations experience weathering, a process that results in physiological dysregulation due to stress associated with persistent disadvantage. Through weathering and continued inequity, aging minoritized populations have an increased risk of exposure and poor health outcomes from COVID-19. SUMMARY: Current literature and available data suggests that aging minoritized persons experience high rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. The current review hypothesizes and supports that observed disparities are the result of inequalities that especially affect Black and Hispanic populations over the lifecourse. Future efforts to address these disparities should emphasize research that supports governments in identifying at-risk groups, providing accessible COVID-19-related information to those groups, and implementing policy that addresses the structural and social inequities that perpetuate current COVID-19 disparities.